Minimum winning versus oversized coalitions in public finance: the role of uncertainty

نویسندگان

  • Tsung-Sheng Tsai
  • C. C. Yang
چکیده

This paper extends Persson, Roland and Tabellini’s (2000) simple legislature in the context of public finance with certainty to uncertainty. In our uncertain world, oversized coalitions (OSCs) as well as minimum winning coalitions (MWCs) may arise in equilibrium, and the agenda setter’s proposed policy may fail to receive a majority support. This is in marked contrast to the certain world in which only MWCs can arise in equilibrium and the agenda setter’s proposal never fails to pass. When OSCs arise, we show that both public good provision and redistribution are likely to achieve their first-best solution even if the legislature is simple. ∗Corresponding author, Tsung-Sheng Tsai. Mailing address: Department of Economics, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Restriction to uniformity and political accountability

This paper discusses the fundamental hypothesis of policy uniformity under centralized decision making underlying Oates’ famous decentralization theorem. The theorem has come under pressure by the prediction that local public goods are provided to minimum winning coalitions rather than uniformly. The focus of this paper is on the impact of uniformity rules on political accountability. Using the...

متن کامل

Bicameral Winning Coalitions & Equilibrium Federal Legislatures

Abstract: I analyze a ‘divide the dollar’ game among Small and Large ‘states’ in a Bicameral legislature where the Upper House represents the regions and the Lower House represents the population. I characterize a stationary equilibrium -as in Baron and Ferejohn (1989) -when the overall probability of recognition of legislators from Large (Small) states is identical in each period. The optimal ...

متن کامل

Is the 52-high-price Strategy Explained by Behavioral Finance? (Uncertainty Effect)

The aim of this study is to investigate a behavioral approach by anchoring bias as a criterion to explain 52-week-high strategy and trough this we can find an explain for momentum strategy at uncertainty situation, to the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The information uncertainty criteria include the book value to market value (BV / MV), company age (Age), the size of the entity...

متن کامل

Minimum winning coalitions and endogenous status quo

I analyze a stochastic bargaining game in which a renewable surplus is divided among n ≥ 5 committee members in each of an infinite number of periods, and the division implemented in one period becomes the status quo allocation of the surplus in the ensuing period. I establish existence of equilibrium exhibiting minimum winning coalitions, assuming sufficiently mild concavity of stage preferenc...

متن کامل

Extension of the Portfolio Allocation Model to Surplus Majority Governments: a Theoretically Salient Case Study

Scholars have long studied the conditions under which the cabinet making process will result in minority, surplus majority, or minimum-winning governing coalitions in parliamentary systems. A recent contribution, Laver and Shepsle's portfolio allocation model, argues that surplus majority coalitions can only form when the number of salient policy dimensions in the political system is greater th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social Choice and Welfare

دوره 34  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010